Descrição
Dans une entrevue donnée en 1952, Reich a affirmé que le texte freudien le malaise dans la culture a été écrit en réponse à une conférence qu'il donna chez Freud sur le thème de la prophylaxie des névroses. Inspiré par ce témoignage, ce travail étudie les thèses reichiennes qui s'opposent à la pensée freudienne de le malaise dans la culture. Les positions des auteurs sont différenciées à partir du conflit inévitable (Freud) et de la possibilité d'harmonie (Reich). Les principales notions mises en valeur sont : la sexualité, l'agressivité et la formation réactive.||In an interview given in 1952 Reich declared that Freud's Civilization and its discontents had been written as a reply to one of his conferences at Freud's house on the prophylaxis of neurosis. Inspired by Reich's words, this paper aims at investigating which of his thesis could be put against Freud's thought in Civilization and its discontents. Freud and Reich's points of view are differentiated based on the notions of inevitable conflict (Freud) and possibility of harmony (Reich). The paper focuses on the notions of sexuality, aggressiveness and reactive formation.||Numa entrevista dada em 1952, Reich afirmou que o texto freudiano O mal-estar na cultura fora escrito em resposta a uma conferência que proferira na casa do Freud sobre o tema profilaxia das neuroses. Inspirado nesse depoimento, este trabalho procura investigar as teses reichianas que se contrapõem ao pensamento freudiano de O mal-estar na cultura. Diferenciam-se as posições dos autores a partir das idéias de conflito inevitável (Freud) e de possibilidade de harmonia (Reich). As principais noções focalizadas são as de: sexualidade, agressividade e formação reativa.
